![]() Apple handles this by maintaining some sort of a whitelist for various displays they’ve tested. MST topologies for single-display/4K60 support aren’t standardized unfortunately. The GPU driver needs to know how to divide its frame buffer for output to the individual tiles, which can vary between monitors. The 4K/MST support requires a software component as well. I’m not sure if the Mac Pro’s GPU hardware can drive upcoming 4K single stream panels or not as AMD specifically lists that as a feature of the new Radeon R9 series. The first generation of 4K displays appear to be a bit of a hack. Note that it is possible to drive a 4K display at 60Hz using a single DisplayPort 1.2 stream, the limitation today appears to be entirely on the monitor side. ![]() By sending two tiles, each behaving like a 1920 x 2160 display (one half of 3840 x 2160), you can get around the bandwidth limitations of the current crop of display hardware. ![]() Originally conceived as a way of daisy chaining multiple displays together off of a single DP output, the current crop of 4K displays use MST to drive a single display. To support 4K at 60Hz, you need to properly enable support for DisplayPort 1.2’s Multi-Stream Transport (MST) feature. Contrary to what Apple’s own support documentation lists, these 4K resolutions at limited refresh rates are supported via both HDMI and Thunderbolt 2/DisplayPort 1.2 on the new rMBPs. That’s acceptable for use as a video preview display, but extremely frustrating for anything else (try watching a mouse cursor animate at 30Hz). While the 2013 MacBook Pro with Retina Display can presently support outputting to either an 3840 x 2160 or 4096 x 2160 external panel, the maximum supported refresh rate is only 30Hz under OS X (and only 24Hz in the case of a 4096 x 2160 display). Alternatively you can connect up to six 2560 x 1440 displays using the Thunderbolt 2 ports at the back of the machine. You can connect two 4K displays via Thunderbolt 2/DisplayPort, and the third 4K display over HDMI. I can’t get 144Hz on either display, so maybe DSC is still broken.A huge part of the Mac Pro revolves around its support for 4K displays. However, as I understand it, a lot of display fixes were backported to Big Sur in one of the point releases, and I’m on the latest Big Sur release. I can’t upgrade to MacOS Montery as this is a work laptop. However, if I go to System Preferences → Displays → Option-click “scaled resolution” → check “show low resolution modes”, and open the “Hz” menu, both cables allow selecting 120Hz no problem!Īre there only certain cables compatible with the Eve Spectrum? Are Intel Macbooks incompatible with the Eve Spectrum in particular? What do I need to buy, or what can I do? What I didn’t expect is that on a Gigabyte M28U, both cables give I connect to the M28U with either cable, it defaults to 4k 60hz. From the forum posts, I thought this was probably a MacOS issue. This doesn’t seem to change regardless of what settings I tweak.Īfter trying all of this, I decided to try a different monitor. ![]() When I connect with the Thunderbolt 4 certified USB-C to USB-C cable, I get no connection at all. ![]() I tried to do a custom resolution, but no luck, it said was invalid (though I may have done this wrong - I used the simplified option, but just selected CVT and maybe I should have selected a different option?) SwitchResX gives an option for but not at 4k. However, even so, I have no option to switch to 120hz or 144hz (not even with a lower resolution). When I connect with the USB-C to DP cable, it defaults automatically.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |